Let’s Dismantle IRS:
This Racket is Busted
by
Paul
Andrew Mitchell
Private
Attorney General
All
Rights Reserved without Prejudice
It’s time to dismantle the Internal Revenue Service. This organization has outlived its usefulness.
The
hunt was on, several years ago, when activists like this writer confirmed that
IRS was never created by any Act of Congress.
It cannot be found in any of the laws which created the U.S. Department
of the Treasury.
The
U.S. Supreme Court quietly admitted as much, at footnote 23 in Chrysler Corp. v. Brown. In a nation governed by the rule of law, this
omission is monumental.
The
search for its real origins has taken this nation down many blind alleys, so
convoluted and complicated are the statutes and regulations which govern its
employees rarely, if ever.
The
best explanation now favors its links to Prohibition, the ill-fated experiment
in outlawing alcohol.
The
Women’s Temperance Movement, we believe, was secretly underwritten by the
petroleum cartel, to perfect a monopoly over automotive fuels. Once that monopoly was in place, Prohibition
was repealed, leaving alcohol high and dry as the preferred fuel for cars and
trucks, and leaving a federal police force inside the several States, to extort
money from the American People.
All
evidence indicates that IRS is an alias for the Federal Alcohol Administration
(“FAA”), which was declared unconstitutional inside the several States by the
U.S. Supreme Court in 1935. The result
of the high Court’s decision in U.S.
v. Constantine confined that FAA to federal territories, like Puerto Rico,
where Congress is the “state” legislature.
Further
confirmation can be found in a decision by the First Circuit Court of Appeals
in Used Tire International, Inc. v.
Manual
Diaz-Saldana, which identified the latter as the real “Secretary of
the Treasury.” The Code of Federal
Regulations for Title 27 also identifies this other “Secretary” as an office in
San Juan, Puerto Rico.
This
is ominous data. It serves to suggest
that IRS has no authority whatsoever to mail envelopes from the “Department of
the Treasury.” Such obvious deception is
prohibited by federal mail fraud statutes, and defined as a predicate to
racketeering.
Moreover,
the vagueness now proven to frequent the Internal Revenue Code forces a legal
conclusion that the entire Code is necessarily void, read “no legal
effect.” The high Court’s test for
vagueness is obviously violated when men and women of common intelligence
cannot agree on its correct meaning, its proper construction, or its
territorial application.
Take,
for instance, a statute at IRC section 7851. Here, Congress has said that all the
enforcement provisions in subtitle F shall take effect on the day after
the date “this title” is enacted. These
provisions include, for example, filing requirements, penalties for failing to
file, and tax evasion.
Guess
what?
Title
26 has never been enacted into positive law, rendering every single section in
subtitle F a big pile of spaghetti, with no teeth whatsoever. Throughout most federal laws, the consistent
legislative practice is to use the term “this title” to refer to a Title of the
United States Code.
To
make matters worse, conscientious courts (an endangered species) have ruled
that taxes cannot be imposed without statutes assigning a specific liability to
certain parties.
There
are no statutes creating a specific liability for taxes imposed by subtitle A
of the Internal Revenue Code. This is
the set of statutes that impose the federal income tax.
Look at it this way: if Congress imposed a tax on chickens, would that necessarily mean that the chickens are liable for the tax?
Obviously
not! Congress would also need to define
the farmer, or the consumer, or the wholesaler, as the party liable for paying
that tax. Chickens, where are your tax
returns?
Without
a liability statute, there can be no liability.
This
now opens another, deeper layer in this can of rotting worms. If IRS is really using fear tactics to extort
an unlawful debt, then it qualifies for careful scrutiny, and prosecution,
under the Racketeer-Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act aka “RICO”.
How
fitting, and how ironic, that IRS is legally domiciled in Puerto RICO.
When
we get down to brass tacks, we find that Congress encourages private Citizens
to investigate and bust rackets, mainly because it perceived a shortage of
public prosecutors talented enough to enforce RICO statutes against organized
crime syndicates.
This
shortage is the real reason why the RICO statute at 18 U.S.C. 1964 awards
triple damages to any party who prevails, using the civil remedies it
provides. And, happily, State courts
like the Superior Court of California also enjoy original jurisdiction to
litigate and issue these remedies.
All
of this would approach comedy in the extreme, were it not also the case that
IRS launders huge sums of money, every day, into foreign banks chiefly owned by
the families that founded the Federal Reserve system.
Did
you think the Federal Reserve was federal government? Guess again!
One
of the biggest shocks of the last century was an admission by President
Reagan’s Grace Commission, that none of the income taxes collected by IRS goes
to pay for any federal government services.
Those
taxes are paying interest to these foreign banks, and benefit payments to
recipients of entitlement programs, like federal pension funds.
So,
the next time your neighbors accuse you of being unpatriotic for challenging
the IRS, we recommend that you demand from them proof that IRS is really
funding any federal government services, like air traffic control, the
Pentagon, the Congress, the Courts, or the White House.
Don’t
hold your breath.
Honestly,
when all the facts are put on a level table top, there is not a single reason
why America should put up with this massive fiscal fraud for one more day.
It’s
now time to dismantle the Internal Revenue Service.
Keeping
all those laundered funds inside this country will result in economic
prosperity without precedent in our nation’s history.
Let’s
bury IRS beneath the Titanic, where it can rust in peace forever along with the
rest of the planet’s jellyfish.
America deserves to be a living, thriving Republic, not another victim of Plank Number Two in the Communist Manifesto.
About the Author:
Paul Andrew Mitchell is a
Private Attorney General and
Webmaster of the Supreme Law Library on the Internet:
See also:
“U.S. Secretary of
the Treasury Falls Silent
in Face of SUBPOENA
for Tax Liability Statutes”
“31
Questions and Answers about the IRS”
“What Is the Federal Income Tax?”
“Electronic Censors
Found at U.C. Berkeley’s Law School”
“Private Attorney General Backs UCB’s Graduate
Instructors”
“Paul Mitchell
Blasts Clinton, Rubin for Racketeering”
“Paul Mitchell
Applauds House Vote to Kill IRC”
“Paul Mitchell Urges
Nation to Boycott IRS”
“Congresswoman
Suspected of Income Tax Evasion”
“Our
Proposal to Save Social Security”
“Charitable
Contributions by the Federal Reserve”
“Legal
Notice in re Withholding Exemption Certificates”
“A
Cogent Summary of Federal Jurisdictions”
“Income Taxes and Government Fraud”
“A Monologue on
Federal Fiscal Fraud”
“Miscellaneous
Letters of Correspondence”
# # #